Colorectal Neoplasia in CDH1 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Multicenter Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Germline variants in CDH1 are associated with elevated risks of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. It is uncertain whether there is an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of colonoscopy outcomes in patients with germline CDH1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included with a mean age of 46.9 years. Initial colonoscopy found adenomatous polyps in 30 patients (35.3%), including advanced adenomas in 9 (10.6%). No colorectal cancers were identified on index or subsequent colonoscopies (when available). DISCUSSION: CDH1 carriers have colorectal neoplasia identified at similar rates as in the general population. Despite potential difficulties after gastrectomy, colorectal cancer screening remains important in this population.

Schimke XLID syndrome results from a deletion in BCAP31.

A family with three affected males and a second family with a single affected male with intellectual disability, microcephaly, ophthalmoplegia, deafness, and Involuntary limb movements were reported by Schimke and Associates in 1984. The affected males with Schimke X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) syndrome (OMIM# 312840) had a similar facial appearance with deep-set eyes, downslanting palpebral fissures, hypotelorism, narrow nose and alae nasi, cupped ears and spacing of the teeth. Two mothers had mild hearing loss but no other manifestations of the disorder. The authors considered the disorder to be distinctive and likely X-linked. Whole genome sequencing in the single affected male available and the three carrier females from one of the families with Schimke XLID syndrome identified a 2 bp deletion in the BCAP31 gene. During the past decade, pathogenic alterations of the BCAP31 gene have been associated with deafness, dystonia, and central hypomyelination, an XLID condition given the eponym DDCH syndrome. A comparison of clinical findings in Schimke XLID syndrome and DDCH syndrome shows them to be the same clinical entity. The BCAP31 protein functions in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation to promote ubiquitination and destruction of misfolded proteins.

Preoperative Screening of Colorectal Cancers Is As Accurate As Postoperative Screening for Detection of Lynch Syndrome.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome with lifetime CRC risks of up to 70%.1 Conventionally, CRC specimens are screened for LS postoperatively but preoperative diagnosis of LS could impact decisions, such as the extent of resection and the need for additional risk-reducing surgeries for uterine and ovarian cancers. Few studies have addressed this issue2-5 and surveys indicate that most gastroenterologists are unsure that LS can be screened for preoperatively.6 We compared the yield of preoperative versus postoperative screening of LS by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in unselected patients with newly diagnosed CRC who underwent testing under real-life laboratory conditions to mimic clinical practice.

Assessment of Diagnostic Outcomes of RNA Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Importance: Performing DNA genetic testing (DGT) for hereditary cancer genes is now a well-accepted clinical practice; however, the interpretation of DNA variation remains a challenge for laboratories and clinicians. Adding RNA genetic testing (RGT) enhances DGT by clarifying the clinical actionability of hereditary cancer gene variants, thus improving clinicians' ability to accurately apply strategies for cancer risk reduction and treatment. Objective: To evaluate whether RGT is associated with improvement in the diagnostic outcome of DGT and in the delivery of personalized cancer risk management for patients with hereditary cancer predisposition. Design, Setting, and Participants: Diagnostic study in which patients and/or families with inconclusive variants detected by DGT in genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer sent blood samples for RGT from March 2016 to April 2018. Clinicians who ordered genetic testing and received a reclassification report for these variants were surveyed to assess whether RGT-related variant reclassifications changed clinical management of these patients. To quantify the potential number of tested individuals who could benefit from RGT, a cohort of 307 812 patients who underwent DGT for hereditary cancer were separately queried to identify variants predicted to affect splicing. Data analysis was conducted from March 2016 and September 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Variant reclassification outcomes following RGT, clinical management changes associated with RGT-related variant reclassifications, and the proportion of patients who would likely be affected by a concurrent DGT and RGT multigene panel testing approach. Results: In total, 93 if 909 eligible families (10.2%) submitted samples for RGT. Evidence from RGT clarified the interpretation of 49 of 56 inconclusive cases (88%) studied; 26 (47%) were reclassified as clinically actionable and 23 (41%) were clarified as benign. Variant reclassifications based on RGT results changed clinical management recommendations for 8 of 18 patients (44%) and 14 of 18 families (78%), based on responses from 18 of 45 clinicians (40%) surveyed. A total of 7265 of 307 812 patients who underwent DGT had likely pathogenic variants or variants of uncertain significance potentially affecting splicing, indicating that approximately 1 in 43 individuals could benefit from RGT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, conducting RNA testing resolved a substantial proportion of variants of uncertain significance in a cohort of individuals previously tested for cancer predisposition by DGT. Performing RGT might change the diagnostic outcome of at least 1 in 43 patients if performed in all individuals undergoing genetic evaluation for hereditary cancer.

Hereditary cancer screening: Case reports and review of literature on ten Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations.

BACKGROUND: Historically, three founder mutations in the BRCA1/2 (OMIM 113705; OMIM 600185) genes have been the focus of cancer risks within the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population. However, there are several additional mutations associated with increased susceptibility to cancer in individuals of AJ ancestry. METHODS: We report three patients who exemplify the need to keep these additional founder mutations in mind when pursuing hereditary cancer genetic testing of individuals in this population. All gene sequences in this paper were aligned to reference sequences based on human genome build GRCh37/UCSC hg19. RESULTS: review of the literature discusses that the combined risk is 12.36%-20.83% forhaving 1 of the 10 hereditary cancer AJ founder mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 (OMIM 604373), APC (OMIM 611731), MSH2 (OMIM 609309), MSH6 (OMIM 600678), and GREM1 (OMIM 603054) genes for individuals of AJ ancestry. CONCLUSION: We recommend testing for all 10 of these AJ founder cancer susceptibility mutations for individuals within this population as standard screening in order to ensure appropriate cancer risk management and cascade testing.

Paraganglioma, neuroblastoma, and a SDHB mutation: Resolution of a 30-year-old mystery.

Familial paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma (PGL/PCC) is genetically heterogenous with mutations in three of the four subunits of the heterotetrameric mitochondrial complex II enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) being causally responsible for the majority of cases. In addition to PGL/PCC an array of non-paraganglial tumors have been described in affected individuals. We present a 30-year follow-up on the family of a deceased patient who synchronously developed malignant neuroblastoma (NBL), PCC, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Other family members with late onset disease have come to our attention, and molecular study revealed a mutation in the SDHB gene. Despite the embryologic relationship, NBL has been seen in only two previous patients with familial PGL/PCC, both with deletions of the SDHB gene. Review of the literature suggests the lack of a reported association between NBL and familial PGL/PCC may be an ascertainment bias. We further suggest that study of the SDH genes in NBL survivors who develop secondary solid tumors, particularly RCC, may correct this bias, and provide for more effective and comprehensive tumor screening in this patient population.

The Hunter-MacDonald syndrome with expanded phenotype including risk of meningioma: an update and review.

Hunter-MacDonald syndrome (HMS) is a rare, autosomal dominant skeletal dysplasia with multiple malformations. The skeletal manifestations of HMS include short stature, scoliosis, epiphyseal dysplasia with early osteoarthritis leading to joint replacement, prominent humeral insertions for the deltoids, camptodactyly, subluxation of the thumbs, and malformed feet. Craniofacial manifestations include normal head circumference, tall forehead, bitemporal narrowing, ptosis, short palpebral fissures, and short philtrum. Decreased hearing acuity, transient cranial nerve palsies, congenital heart defects, and meningioma are also reported. Herein, we present two cases, and, through review of the manifestations of HMS in affected and at-risk family members, we have observed that predisposition to brain tumor is a cardinal feature of this condition.